“I believe that we should read Dr. Manganelli’s article in ENGL 300 because it bridges the gap between two different ideas (in this case, the mulatta and the muse) in order to show how effortless it is to find a cohesion between both ideas for the purpose of elaborating on a subject of which we are familiar or that we find to have a personal, cultural or society connection to ourselves (gender, race, sexuality or a combination of two or three of those concepts). With that being said, this particular article would probably only appeal to the female students and maybe the minority students of the class. Still, it is possible for students who are male or non-minority to formulate opinions and thoughts about how things such as gender sexuality or racial individuality can affect them and how they view the world because many of our discussions in class have been based around this type of thought creation and processing.”